Skip to main content

Control system philosophy - what is the best setup? - Knowledgebase / Power Management / easYgen-3000XT - Woodward Technical Support

Control system philosophy - what is the best setup?

Authors list
  • Justin Schneider

Throughout the last decades we've seen thousands of customer applications. The more complex the applications the more important the conceptual work and everything starts with a philosophy - in this article the electrical control philosophy.

The following slides were created because a customer project team questioned the control concept on a very high level. Therefore we provided our point of view, based on customer feedback, which we gathered throughout the last years. I hope you'll find this helpful as well... (the following considerations are independent of selected suppliers)


 control system layersSlide1.JPG


Woodward's controllers the system:

Slide2.JPG


It is possible to cover a lot of functionality in Layer 3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such an approach?

Slide3.JPG


Generic & typical differences between the different LayersSlide4.JPG


Typical functionality in Layer 2, which Woodward covers in it's controls

Slide5.JPG


Slide6.JPG


For very complex applications, it makes sense / one could consider to move the breaker logic and sequencing to Layer 3. If there are too many different factors, which would influence these scenarios.

Slide7.JPG


This is how it could work with a simple PLC on layer 3, which drives actions on layer 2.

Slide8.JPG


Slide9.JPG


Slide10.JPG


Slide11.JPG